Saturday, 18 June 2011

US led UNSC Dilution of Sanction Against Taliban Against Indian Security Interests: MEA Voice Ineffectual

As the US scuttle in Afghanistan gathers steam, moves such as the UNSC split of sanctions between AL-Qaeda and the Taliban, will become more frequent.

The Indian MEA has been characteristically muted in its criticism at the move. The statements by the Indian envoy to the United Nations, Hardeep Singh Puri:  "The syndicate of terrorism, with intricate inter-connections, comprising al-Qaeda, elements of the Taliban, Lashkar-e-Taiba and other terrorist groups that operate from within and outside Afghan borders are among the biggest threats from terrorism worldwide," as well as, "This is a scenario that we can ill-afford in our fight against terrorism," and "The process of listings as well as de-listings needs to be guided by the same set of principles - fairness, credibility and transparency."  have been lost in the general din of the other statements carried on this issue by Indian and global media

It does not help India's case that it is one of the 15 member of the Security Council to approve resolutions 1988 and 1989. The other notable voice opposed to this selective delisting was Russia.


The US State Department statement on the UNSC sanctions split is clearly a precursor to new negotiations with the Taliban: "Passage of UNSC Resolution 1988, which establishes the Afghanistan sanctions regime, is a tangible sign of support by the international community for Afghan reconciliation efforts. At the same time, the resolution contributes to ongoing efforts to combat the insurgency. The new regime will be an important tool to support the Government of Afghanistan’s efforts to reconcile with insurgents who are willing cut ties to international terrorist organizations, including al-Qaida, renounce violence, and respect Afghanistan’s constitution, including its protections for all Afghan women and men."


The comments of Susan Rice, US envoy to the United Nations were particularly telling, when she said, “Today’s action shows that the Security Council can adapt flexibly to evolving threats.” That this flexibility on terror comes at the cost of other nations, when it suits American interests is ironic.

Pussy footing by India against its interests both at issues as such international anti-terror regimes, as well as lack of engagement with the Taliban, will see India eventually reap a whirlwind in Kashmir and other theaters of potential India-Taliban conflict.

The US it must be noted has been traditionally delinquent where India's security needs are concerned and consequences for its actions should be across the board including defense purchases and voting for similar measures in the UN, in congruence with Indian interests rather than any notions of misplaced loyalty that are seldom reciprocated.

India and its foreign policy continue to be hobbled by crusty past positions that have either become defunct or in some cases even reversed. Instead of being lead by self interest, it is led by notions and bureaucratic precedent. Even when there is innovation in relations with the US, China or Pakistan, it is rendered stillborn due to an inability to communicate on the world stage, characterized by a poor understanding of media relations and strategic PR. 

A quick visit to the MEA website for statements as well as press releases showed no press releases on the official Indian statement! The Press Information Bureau portal showed zero press releases from the MEA in the entire month of June till the date of posting this piece!



 

Wednesday, 8 June 2011

Toot Goes The Media Gravy Train - On the Wrong Side of History!

Those in the Indian Media on the wrong side of history, peddling Congress Government spin shamelessly, this is for you: 

What you can not comprehend, must be demonized.

What is upsetting the apple cart must be communal. 

What can not be understand must be discredited. 

Cynicism, justification and obfuscation, fortunately the people of India have seen through all this, and the lies have all come unstuck! 

Even if Baba Ramdev was RSS, what is so bad about the RSS? If you had intellectual problems with the RSS,  how do you derail an Anna?

Law & Order is a State subject, so what is Chidambaram doing as Union Home Minister (MHA) commenting on affairs of the Delhi State?
The shamelessness of Congress gets obscene. Chidambaram thinks that people are fools. Days of communal tinderbox comments and bullshit are over. When there was a real terror threat, this government did sweet fuckall, now they go and assault unarmed fasting protesters sleeping, like assasins in the thick of the night. The arrogance and the stupidity is palpable!
Another person who gets a lot of press is Digvijay Singh, a skilled practitioner of a pedestrian discourse, and lowly political techniques, a man of gambit, of despicable sacrifice maneuvers, coupled with a plausible denial. The Congress uses such gambits and such people, all the time, to discredit inconvenient opponents win cheap popularity with its Muslim vote bank or to appeal to other anti RSS scaremongers, brown sahibs and Left Liberals. How is it that no one in the media ever questions such communal and lowly discourse, the temptation to sensationalize wins over the need to learn to look beyond it and even counter it.
What about everything else that is wrong with the Congress Government from Oil Price Decontrol to Deficit Management to Inflation, to Corruption-2G, to Security, Terror Preparedness, to Extra-Constitutional power centers like the NAC that are a fraud on the constitution?

These are questions posterity will judge you on, and you better have some good answers or history will not forgive you! These are amazing times. Times of change, of monumental progress in the journey of Indian democracy, of secularism and of freedom itself.

The Anatomy of Stillborn Congress Communist CAA NRC Campaign

The anatomy of a Protest in a democracy has a short half-life. The appetite for idealism fades very quickly as things start to catch f...